Elizabeth Cabraser, a renowned litigator and name partner in the plaintiffs’ law firm of Lieff, Cabraser, Heimann & Bernstein, speaks with Reynolds Holding about settling the class action against Volkswagen for rigging emissions tests, the challenges of mass actions generally and her love of music and cars. Click on the arrow (and on “read more” if you’re on our home page) to hear the conversation — on the Blue Sky Banter podcast.… Read more
Professor Lynn LoPucki of UCLA School of Law speaks with Reynolds Holding about the competition among states for corporate charters. Many people assume that the game is over and Delaware — the corporate home of more than half of U.S. public companies — has won. But as Professor LoPucki explains, Delaware is vulnerable, the competition continues, and as a result the regulation of corporations in America is just about non-existent. Click on “read more” to hear the conversation — on the Blue Sky Banter podcast… Read more
The Delaware Chancery Court’s vice chancellor speaks with Reynolds Holding about Dell, DFC Global and appraisal actions, which allow holdout shareholders who didn’t vote for a deal to ask the court to set a higher price for their stock. The big issue: Why isn’t the merger price necessarily fair value? Click on “read more” to hear the conversation — the inaugural edition of the Blue Sky Banter podcast.… Read more
An M&A appraisal case before the Delaware Supreme Court has drawn amicus briefs from two groups of esteemed professors — including three from Columbia Law School — with opposing views on how a company should be valued.
The case involves the sale in 2014 of payday lender DFC Global to private equity firm Lone Star Funds for $9.50 a share, or about $1.3 billion. Muirfield Value Partners and three other DFC investors argued that the price was too low and filed an appraisal action, which allows shareholders that did not vote for the buyout to ask a judge to determine … Read more
The Blue Sky Blog will be quiet for the next week, but we will be back, better than ever, for the New Year. Happy Holidays.… Read more
The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments today — transcript here — in U.S. v. Salman, the first insider trading case to land before the justices in almost 20 years. The issue: What counts as the “personal benefit” to the insider required under Dirks v. SEC for there to be illegal insider trading? Is it “an exchange that is objective, consequential, and represents at least a potential gain of a pecuniary or similarly valuable nature,” as the Second Circuit said in U.S. v. Newman in 2014? Or is the satisfaction of helping a close relative enough, as the Ninth Circuit … Read more