Wachtell Update on the Halliburton Fraud-on-the-Market Case

As we have described in our prior memos (here and here), in Halliburton Co. v. Erica P. John Fund, Inc., No. 13-317, the Supreme Court will decide whether or not to abandon the “fraud on the market” presumption of reliance that has facilitated class-action treatment of claims brought under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and SEC Rule 10b–5.  The case will be argued before the Court on March 5, and a decision will likely come by the end of June.  As our earlier memos explained, Halliburton is potentially the most important securities case that the Court has heard in a long time.

Last week, various amici curiae supporting the overturning of the fraud-on-the-market presumption filed briefs in the Supreme Court.  Our Firm and Stanford law professor Joseph Grundfest filed a brief (available here; printed copies available on request) on behalf of a distinguished group of law professors and former commissioners and officials of the SEC, arguing that, under settled principles of statutory interpretation, the Exchange Act should not be read to permit a presumption of reliance.  Our brief argues that the judicially created right of action under Section 10(b) should be construed similarly to the comparable, express right of action established in Section 18(a) of the Exchange Act.  Because Section 18(a) requires proof of actual reliance, we argue that Section 10(b) should likewise require it.  Our brief also rebuts the argument that the fraud-on-the-market presumption deserves stare decisis effect, as well as the argument that Congress, by failing to overturn the presumption, has acquiesced in it.

Although it is impossible to predict, there is some reason to think that these arguments will be the ones upon which the case will turn.  For example, defendant Halliburton’s opening brief prominently cites the certiorari-stage brief we submitted to the Court last October, as well as an article written by Professor Grundfest last August, both of which also argued that Section 10(b) should be construed to require proof of actual reliance in accordance with Section 18(a).

170 Comments

  1. I don’t know if it’s just me or if perhaps everybody else experiencing
    issues with your website. It appears like some
    of the written text in your posts are running off the screen. Can somebody
    else please provide feedback and let me know if this is happening to them as well?
    This might be a problem with my browser because I’ve had this happen previously.
    Many thanks

  2. Have you ever considered writing an e-book or guest authoring on other sites?
    I have a blog centered on the same information you discuss and would love to have you
    share some stories/information. I know my audience would value your work.

    If you’re even remotely interested, feel free to shoot me an e mail.

  3. Just wish to say your article is as amazing. The clearness
    in your post is just cool and that i can suppose you are knowledgeable in this subject.
    Well along with your permission allow me to snatch your RSS feed to keep up to date
    with forthcoming post. Thank you 1,000,000 and please carry on the gratifying work.

  4. Write more, thats all I have to say. Literally, it seems as
    though you relied on the video to make your point. You obviously know what youre talking about, why waste your intelligence on just posting
    videos to your blog when you could be giving us something
    enlightening to read?

  5. Contact Abelard Restoration immediately and receive a free estimate on mold removal in Suffolk County and Nassau
    County NY and the cities of: New York City, Bronx,
    Brooklyn, Flushing, Jamaica, White Plains,
    Yonkers, Manhattan, Queens, Newark, New Brunswick, Stamford, Bridgeport,
    Rye, Palisades and Rochelle Park, New York. Over the weekend,
    the Makeup Eaminer received quite a few emails rom readeers who were asking questions
    about nail damage and overall nail health. The most important asset that people facing such a situation may have
    is information that will aid them with their efforts.

  6. Yet couples in Canada and Netherlands are adopting American riad marrakech sultana
    children. I was an intellectual middle class, and as deserving of reparation, as a
    result of having been beaten by security forces during attempts to cross the fence.
    It says registrations of motor homes from manufacturers to dealers rose 13.
    Lowry was in the riad marrakech sultana NWA.
    We didn’t see any victims, we didn’t see the thunderhead until it was nearly on top of that.
    I riad marrakech sultana had a little bit would be a chore to
    take it into public ownership.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title="" rel=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <pre> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>