Sky Blog
In January 2026, the Delaware Supreme Court issued an en banc decision in J&J v. Fortis, a high-profile earnout dispute arising from Johnson & Johnson’s acquisition of Auris Health, involving up to $2.35 billion in contingent payments tied to regulatory …
In its recent decision in Marchner v. B. Riley Financial, Inc., the Delaware Court of Chancery reaffirmed the principle that Caremark cannot be used to repackage hindsight attacks on failed investments as fiduciary breaches. The court explained that directors’ …
In a significant ruling last month, the Delaware Supreme Court reversed a Chancery Court decision that had invalidated an 18-month, nationwide noncompete agreement at the pleading stage. The decision in Payscale Inc. v. Norman, __ A.3d __, No. 297, …
The Delaware Supreme Court’s recent decision in Moelis & Company v. West Palm Beach Firefighters’ Pension Fund distinguished “void” corporate acts from “voidable” ones in a way that will significantly affect future stockholder litigation.[1] The distinction is important because …
On February 27, 2026, in a unanimous 37-page opinion, the Delaware Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of significant changes to the Delaware General Corporation Law (DGCL) enacted in March 2025 via Senate Bill 21 (SB 21). This decision permits …
In May 2025, an important and largely unnoticed development occurred in the corporate-law competition among states. In response to Delaware’s SB 21, Nevada enacted AB239, extending its exculpation statute — which had previously shielded only directors and officers from …
Recently in Johnson & Johnson et al. v. Fortis Advisors, LLC, the Delaware Supreme Court reversed, in part, the Delaware Court of Chancery’s ruling that a buyer breached the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing (the “implied …
Elon Musk finally has his 2018 Tesla pay package back. The Delaware Supreme Court has spoken. The saga that consumed years of litigation, untold judicial energy, and more Twitter commentary than any fiduciary duty case deserves is, at least formally, …
Elon Musk can cash the largest paycheck in history, the Supreme Court of Delaware has ruled in a narrow and sensible opinion grounded in longstanding principles of equity and contract law.
To catch up: Tesla and Musk entered into an …
There have recently been three excellent working papers on the problems facing Delaware corporate law—one by Professor Charles Whitehead, one by Professors Marcel Kahan and Ed Rock, and one by practitioners Greg Varallo, Andrew Blumberg, and Ben Potts…
SEC Chairman Paul Atkins’ speech last week in Delaware sounded to many like a death knell for shareholder proposals under Rule 14a-8. In fact, it was far more strategic: the opening move to test whether Delaware corporate law even permits …
On October 15, the Delaware Supreme Court heard arguments in In re Tesla, Inc. Derivative Litigation, more commonly known as Richard J. Tornetta v. Elon Musk, et al. and Tesla, Inc., the stockholder derivative action rescinding Elon Musk’s …
Founders and early investors increasingly maintain control of companies while holding small economic stakes in them – raising fundamental questions about how Delaware courts can enforce accountability in corporate governance. In a new working paper, I challenge the courts’ …
In a recent article, I analyze the function of shareholder ratification in corporate governance and argue that understanding this function is critical to both refining shareholder-based cleansing mechanisms and appreciating their inherent limitations. Although I focus on Corwin cleansing in …
As I write this from the Tulane Corporate Law Institute’s annual conference in New Orleans, the energy is palpable. While Mardi Gras revelers have vacated the streets, they’ve been replaced by a different phalanx of uncharacteristically confrontational carousers: corporate law …
On February 20, Delaware Supreme Court Chief Justice Collins Seitz met with members of the state’s General Assembly and delivered some sobering words: “Along with our respect for your legislative judgments, I ask you to consider the importance of judicial …
In Maffei v. Palkon, the Delaware Supreme Court unanimously held that the business judgment rule applies to a corporation’s decision to change its state of incorporation, even if the move arguably favors a controlling stockholder by reducing future liability …
Last week, in Maffei v. Palkon, the Delaware Supreme Court held that the decision to change the corporate domicile of a Delaware corporation with a controlling stockholder to Nevada is subject to the business judgment rule, making stockholder challenges …
One distinctive feature of the U.S. economy over recent decades has been the rise of the entrepreneur-dominated public company. This development has derived largely from the growth of private funding available through venture capital, so that initial public offerings have …