
What Happened to “Meaningfully Close Personal Relationship” in Insider Trading?
Did insider trading law almost devolve into an effort to define what kind of relationship a tipper and tippee must have for a defendant to be liable? And was any federal judge or jury qualified to say? Since the Second Circuit’s decisions in United States v. Newman[1] and United States v. Martoma,[2] courts, prosecutors, and regulators no longer need to figure out what a “meaningfully close personal relationship” is. Now, merely giving a tip to a complete stranger may actually violate Rule 10b-5.
Newman was the kind of case that my superiors at the Securities and Exchange … Read more