For decades, European policymakers have aspired to create a single capital market capable of financing innovation on a scale comparable to that of the United States. Yet, as reiterated by the recent Letta and Draghi Reports, that ambition remains …

In a new article, I argue that, under current Delaware law, there is a collision between the definition of pre-suit demand and shareholder voice. To demonstrate, imagine that a sophisticated institutional shareholder of a Delaware public corporation has determined that …

In response to fears that companies would reincorporate in states like Texas or Nevada, the Delaware legislature recently enacted a controversial bill (SB-21) that makes the state’s law friendlier to persons controlling corporations. Many writers have commented on the Delaware …

Corporate law requires the directors of ordinary, for-profit corporations to manage firms in the best interests of shareholders, forbidding directors from sacrificing corporate profits in service of other goals. There has been longstanding debate, even amid proponents of this rule, …

In recent years, the failure of high-profile startups has drawn renewed attention to a persistent question in the venture capital (VC) world: How much diligence is enough when speed of investment is at a premium? Collapses at the likes of …

We are living in a particularly polarized era, and corporate governance is no exception.  The divisions have threatened to spill over to Delaware, the preferred jurisdiction for incorporation in the United States, with several high-profile cases calling the state’s neutrality …

Controlling shareholders function as a dual-edged sword in corporate governance. They can reduce agency costs by monitoring management but also pose risks of self-dealing that can harm minority shareholders. In recent years, Delaware courts have increasingly focused on the latter …

The 2024 amendments to the Delaware General Corporation Law (“DGCL”) were born from an atypical period of acrimony and controversy among the corporate bar, stockholder advocates, and corporate law academics, including harsh public criticism of members of the Court of …

In the realm of corporate law, board directors are bound by fiduciary duties of loyalty and care to both the company and its stockholders.[1] The interpretation of these duties, however, is national, even in the European Union, despite its …

Corporate politicization, when companies take sides in our culture war and risk alienating half their potential customers, is a serious concern. Recent examples of companies that have felt its negative impact on shareholder value abound, including  Bud Light, Target, and …

The material adverse effect (“MAE”) definition in mergers and acquisitions agreements is one of the most intensely negotiated, litigated, and studied contract provisions ever. It has nearly tripled in average length over the past two decades, as lawyers haggle over …

The debate over the corporation’s purpose is today a central topic of corporate law scholarship. So far, the discussion has advanced little beyond a two-sided view, considering only the approaches known as shareholder primacy and corporate social responsibility (CSR). In …

Business persons and lawyers have long debated whether a business corporation does or should have a purpose other than advancing shareholder interests.  In a democratic, pluralist society, the issue of corporate purpose remains important and will not (and should not) …