Delaware Law

Paul Weiss Discusses Delaware Decision Applying Business Judgment Rule to “Clear Day” Approval of Reincorporation

By by

In Maffei v. Palkon, the Delaware Supreme Court unanimously held that the business judgment rule applies to a corporation’s decision to change its state of incorporation, even if the move arguably favors a controlling stockholder by reducing future liability …

Mythical Adverse Effect

By by

The material adverse effect (“MAE”) definition in mergers and acquisitions agreements is one of the most intensely negotiated, litigated, and studied contract provisions ever. It has nearly tripled in average length over the past two decades, as lawyers haggle over …

The Myth of Director Consent: After Shaffer, Beyond Nicastro

By by

In an article just published in the Delaware Journal of Corporate Law, I argue that Delaware’s implied-consent-to-jurisdiction statute is unconstitutional. That statute, Section 3114, is routinely invoked to assert personal jurisdiction over virtually every nonresident director and officer defendant in …

Editor's Tweet |
Editor's Tweet: Professor Eric Chiappinelli of Texas Tech University School of Law discusses "The Myth of Director Consent: After Shaffer, Beyond Nicastro"

Gibson Dunn on Controlling Shareholders and the Business Judgment Rule in Going Private Merger Transactions

By and by

On May 29, 2013, Chancellor Leo E. Strine, Jr. of the Delaware Court of Chancery issued an important decision that lays the foundation for controlling stockholders to pursue going-private merger transactions with the comfort that, if certain conditions are met, …

Editor's Tweet | 1 Comment  
Editor's Tweet: Gibson Dunn on Controlling Shareholders and the Business Judgment Rule in Going Private Merger Transactions http://wp.me/p2Xx5U-123