Shearman & Sterling explains Compliance with the Formal Approval Requirements of Delaware Law Required for Stockholder Ratification of Director Compensation

On October 28th, the Delaware Chancery Court, in Espinoza v. Zuckerberg, et al. (“Espinoza”)[1], held that stockholder ratification of a transaction that was approved by an interested board of directors must be accomplished formally through a vote …

The Way We Pay Now

The last decade has seen a dramatic shift away from stock options and in favor of performance-based equity or “performance shares” in senior executive packages at large US public companies. Once accounting for over 60% of ex ante executive pay …

Simpson Thacher discusses Delaware Chancery Court Ruling that Self-Interested Director Compensation Decisions May, Under Certain Circumstances, Be Subject to Entire Fairness Review

A recent Delaware Chancery Court decision confirms that, as the court held three years ago in Seinfeld v. Slager, there is no shareholder ratification defense for self-awarded director compensation granted under a stockholder-approved option or bonus plan that lacks …

CEO Side-Payments in M&A Deals

In addition to change-of-control benefits (“golden parachutes”), executives often negotiate for personal side-payment at the same time that they are bargaining with an acquirer over the sale of their firm. Side-payments differ from golden parachutes in that they are negotiated …

WilmerHale discusses Final Section 162(m) Regulations Clarify Transition Rules for Newly Public Companies and the Per Participant Limit Requirement

Following the issuance of proposed regulations in June 2011, the Internal Revenue Service issued final regulations on March 30, 2015 clarifying certain exceptions to the compensation deduction limitation imposed by Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code. Section 162(m) imposes …