Milbank discusses Title VII and the Volcker Rule: Same swap, different rules

Now that the final rule[1] implementing Section 619 of the Dodd-Frank Act,[2] commonly known as the “Volcker Rule,”[3] has been implemented, banking entities engaged in swaps activities must plan how they will navigate the two different and overlapping regulatory regimes

Editor's Tweet |
Editor's Tweet: Milbank discusses Title VII and the Volcker Rule: Same swap, different rules http://wp.me/p2Xx5U-1Kr

Sullivan & Cromwell discusses Potential Expansion of Liability Theories Under the Martin Act

New York State Attorney General and BlackRock Settle Investigation into BlackRock’s Analyst Survey Program, Signaling Potential Expansion of Martin Act Liability Under “Insider Trading 2.0” Theory 

SUMMARY

On January 8, 2014, the New York State Attorney General and BlackRock, Inc.

Editor's Tweet |
Editor's Tweet: Sullivan & Cromwell discusses Potential Expansion of Liability Theories Under the Martin Act http://wp.me/p2Xx5U-1Kb

Clifford Chance on Exemptions for Inter-Affiliate and Intragroup Transactions Under Dodd-Frank and EMIR

On January 16, 2014, Clifford Chance released a briefing, available  here, on exemptions for inter-affiliate and intragroup transactions under the U.S. Dodd-Frank Act and the European Market Infrastructure Regulation (“EMIR”).  Both impose obligations requiring the clearing and reporting of …

Cleary Gottlieb discusses U.S. Supreme Court’s Sharp Limits on General Jurisdiction Over Corporate Defendants

On January 14, the U.S. Supreme Court issued Daimler AG v. Bauman, further clarifying—and significantly narrowing—the constitutional limitations on a court’s assertion of general jurisdiction over a corporate defendant. Bauman carries significant implications for how corporate defendants should evaluate their

Editor's Tweet |
Editor's Tweet: Cleary Gottlieb discusses U.S. Supreme Court's Sharp Limits on General Jurisdiction Over Corporate Defendants http://wp.me/p2Xx5U-1Kk

Rise of IntercontinentalExchange and Implications of its Merger with NYSE Euronext

The following comes to us from Latoya C. Brown, a practicing attorney in Florida and a former intern at the US Securities & Exchange Commission. The views expressed herein are those of the author and not necessarily those of the

Editor's Tweet |
Editor's Tweet: Latoya Brown on the Rise of the IntercontinentalExchange and Implications of its Merger with NYSE Euronext http://wp.me/p2Xx5U-1Fb

Directors Designated by Venture Capitalists and Other Preferred Stockholders Need To Be Mindful of Inherent Conflicts: In re Trados Inc. Shareholder Litigation

The following post is based on a memo released by Pepper Hamilton LLP on September 4, 2013. 

A recent post-trial decision by Vice Chancellor J. Travis Laster of the Delaware Court of Chancery puts directors serving as designees of preferred …

Davis Polk Discusses OCC’s Risk Governance Guidelines for Banks

The OCC has proposed a set of enforceable and specific risk governance guidelines to formalize its heightened expectations for large national banks and federal savings associations. The risk governance guidelines would set new, and much higher, minimum standards for the …

Editor's Tweet |
Editor's Tweet: Davis Polk Discusses OCC's Risk Governance Guidelines for Banks

Sidley Austin discusses Fed’s New Guidance on Managing Outsourcing Risk

On December 5, 2013, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (“Board”) released Supervisory Letter SR 13-19, “Guidance on Managing Outsourcing Risk” (“Guidance”). The Guidance is the most recent publication in a series of supervisory and enforcement actions

Editor's Tweet |
Editor's Tweet: Sidley Austin discusses Fed's New Guidance on Managing Outsourcing Risk http://wp.me/p2Xx5U-1IH

Baker & Hostetler discusses Mark Cuban Defeating the SEC’s Insider Trading Charges

The high profile long-running saga between Mark Cuban — entrepreneur, television personality, and billionaire owner of the Dallas Mavericks — and the SEC has finally ended with Mr. Cuban emerging victorious. On October 16, 2013, after less than four hours …

Editor's Tweet |
Editor's Tweet: Baker & Hostetler discusses Mark Cuban Defeating the SEC's Insider Trading Charges http://wp.me/p2Xx5U-1Ef

After The Fraud on the Market Doctrine: What Should Replace It?

Like children on Christmas Eve, securities defense attorneys and corporate executives are waiting in hopeful anticipation for the Supreme Court’s coming decision in Halliburton Co. v. Erica P. John Fund, Inc. (“Halliburton II”), which may overrule the “fraud on the market” doctrine (“FOTM”) that was announced over a quarter century ago in Basic v. Levinson.[1] Academics are divided, with probably the majority fearing the loss of general deterrence if the securities class action is substantially undercut. Conversely, a minority (including this author) believe it is remarkable that FOTM has survived as long as it has because it is extraordinarily ill-suited to the real world of securities fraud (as hereafter explained). A third more nervous group of spectators are the managing partners of litigation-oriented law firms, who know that FOTM’s potential abolition would likely imply a steep decline in securities litigation, which is the staple of their practice. Ironically, some of the securities defense attorneys eagerly awaiting FOTM’s demise may next year be learning how to litigate patent cases. Be careful then what you wish for, as you may get it.
Editor's Tweet | 1 Comment  
Editor's Tweet: Professor John Coffee on Columbia Law: After The Fraud on the Market Doctrine: What Should Replace It?

ISS Publishes Guidance on Director Compensation (and Other Qualification) Bylaws

In the latest instance of proxy advisors establishing a governance standard without offering evidence that it will improve corporate governance or corporate performance, ISS has adopted a new policy position that appears designed to chill board efforts to protect against …

Editor's Tweet |
Editor's Tweet: ISS Publishes Guidance on Director Compensation (and Other Qualification) Bylaws